Cheat, Lie & SteaL
Meet the real criminals
Mr. Cheat
You cant really trust a word I say. But I charge a lot and it doesnt matter to me if you win or lose as long as I get paid. I look trustworthy and I talk a good talk, what else do you want?
Ms. Lie
I claim to stand for integrity, but I’m hiding the truth. You might think I’m too young to be so corrupted. That’s your problem.
Mrs. Steal
You might think for some bizarre reason that women are more trustworthy than men, for both male and female clients. If you believe that then Mrs Steal will be the one to clean you out.
If you have a legal problems in Canada with a lawyer, a law society, a judge, judicial council or a politicians I can help.
Lawyers in the past used to use claims that they have a personal connection to the judge but that is discouraged these days. I have no personal connections that I can lean on and have had zero success in Court. However I know that the Legal system in Canada is in breach of our governing document – the Charter of Rights because I served them and they haven’t responded. When the government is in breach it cannot enforce the law because it is operating outside the law, and the Rule of Law states that no-one is the above the law. In order to respect the law, the Government must repair the breach before they can enforce the law, lawfully at any rate.
I would assert that law societies are in breach of their governing Act of Parliament which typically has a clause like the protection of the public being their purpose and the reason for Parliament providing a monopoly to their members. I know for a fact that the BC Law Society is in breach of the Act of Parliament. I’m sure it would not be hard to gather the information to establish that other law societies are also in breach. The BC Law Society failed to investigate or punish a lawyer who admitted to failing to comply with a court order and altered court documents to mislead the court. Who exactly are they protecting? It’s not the public. I have never met a lawyer who will expose corruption within the legal profession and from the reports from the public there is a vast untapped market of potential lawsuits waiting for service. But obviously the Judiciary in the Courts are biased toward their brethren, the lawyers and so it is a pretty biased battle.
Some thoughts to consider:
The law is too powerful to be held in the exclusive hands of lawyers. They have no legitimacy to speak to the public interest when they profit from our misfortune.
The legitimate check on the powers of the Judiciary and Lawyers in a Representative Democracy is Parliament. Unfortunately lawyers are by their nature attracted to power and have placed themselves within this structure of Democratic Power in conflict with the Doctrine of the Separation of Powers. The Doctrine promotes a three part system of mutual checks and balances between the Judiciary, Executive and Parliament to ensure that no one branch of Government controls the coercive powers of the State to prevent abuse of the public, whom they serve and remain the sole custodians of their legitimate and endlessly enduring human rights.
If you are involved in a dispute with a lawyer, or a law society, or a judge, or a judicial conduct board, or a politician in a rule of law issue then perhaps I will be able to provide you with some assistance.